Jim Thompson

Email Jim at jim.thompson@ipulpmedia.com

By Jim Thompson

Unless for some reason, your company is keeping an extremely tight watch on the assets v. liabilities ratio (such a covenants with lenders; comparison with peers), I would guess that your company is underutilizing asset assignment opportunities. In other words, more expenditures need to be capitalized within the limits of the tax code in your country, less need to be expensed.

For our example, let's use the northwest US mill that had a catastrophic explosion this past spring. This involved a 1 M gallon tank. A conservative budget puts the installed cost for a new tank at $3 M. Last summer, a year ago, inspectors said the tank could be repaired. Let's say that would have been $2 M.

The capacity of this mill is roughly 500,000 tons per year of paperboard and pulp.

For only the purposes of this exercise, we will take the age back to 1980, or 46 years.

If the maintenance outlined above had been expensed in 2025 (when the last inspection report was written) that would be a hit of $4/ton in 2025.

If a new tank had been installed and capitalized in 2024 with thirty-year life, the cost per ton for those thirty years would be $0.20 per ton. De minimis.

Both solutions would require downtime; it is likely the new tank would require less downtime because it could be constructed, ready to go, while the old tank was still in service. Downtime would just be the tie-in time.

In my career, I have seen many poor decisions like this one. It is as if people, high enough in the organization to know better, can't see the difference between capital and expense dollars. I even worked for a company at one time that used RONAE (Return on Net Assets Employed) to measure their performance. RONAE even considers all depreciation, hence the message to the operating units was to work with junk. Your facility was not doing well if your RONAE was not over 80%.

The lesson is you must look at both ways of accomplishing heavy maintenance--capitalize or expense. Make smart decisions. This is not a one size that fits all decision.

Be safe and we will talk next week.

For a deeper dive, go here.

Strategic Capital Management and Asset Assignment Study Guide

This study guide explores the financial and operational implications of asset assignment, specifically the choice between capitalizing and expensing major industrial expenditures. Based on the analysis of a specific case study involving a paperboard and pulp mill, these materials examine how financial metrics and accounting choices influence long-term facility health.

Part 1: Short-Answer Quiz

Instructions: Answer the following questions in two to three sentences based on the provided text.

1. What is the primary argument regarding how most companies handle asset assignment?
2. In the provided case study of the northwest US mill, what were the two financial options for addressing the tank issue?
3. How does the author calculate the financial "hit" per ton if the tank maintenance had been expensed in 2025?
4. What is the projected cost per ton over a thirty-year period if a new tank is capitalized?
5. Why does the author suggest that a new tank installation might result in less downtime than a repair?
6. Under what specific conditions might a company need to maintain an extremely tight watch on its assets v. liabilities ratio?
7. What does the acronym RONAE stand for, and how is it used?
8. According to the author's experience, how can a focus on RONAE negatively affect the quality of a facility's equipment?
9. What was the specific performance benchmark for RONAE mentioned in the text, and what message did it send to operating units?
10. What is the author's final recommendation regarding the decision to capitalize or expense heavy maintenance?

Part 2: Answer Key

1. Primary Argument: The author argues that most companies underutilize asset assignment opportunities by failing to capitalize expenditures within the limits of the tax code. Instead of capitalizing, many organizations over-rely on expensing, which can lead to poor long-term financial and operational outcomes.
2. Case Study Options: The mill could have either expensed a $2 million repair based on an inspection report or capitalized a $3 million investment for a new 1-million-gallon tank. The choice represented a significant difference in both immediate cash flow and long-term cost distribution.
3. Expensed Hit Calculation: With a mill capacity of 500,000 tons per year, an expensed repair cost of $2 million would result in a financial hit of $4.00 per ton for the year 2025. This represents a significant immediate impact on the production cost for that specific fiscal year.
4. Capitalized Cost per Ton: If the $3 million new tank was capitalized over a thirty-year lifespan, the cost is reduced to a "de minimis" amount of $0.20 per ton. This demonstrates how capitalization spreads the financial burden across the entire useful life of the asset.
5. Downtime Advantage: A new tank can be constructed and prepared for service while the old tank remains operational, meaning downtime is limited only to the "tie-in" time. Conversely, a repair likely requires the existing tank to be out of service for the duration of the work, increasing lost production time.
6. Asset v. Liability Ratios: Companies should only maintain an extremely tight watch on this ratio if they are bound by specific covenants with lenders or if they are performing a strict comparison with industry peers. Otherwise, the author suggests a more flexible approach to capitalization is often beneficial.
7. RONAE Definition: RONAE stands for Return on Net Assets Employed. It is a performance metric used by some organizations to measure the efficiency and profitability of the capital invested in their operations.
8. Negative Impact of RONAE: Because RONAE accounts for all depreciation, it encourages managers to keep older, fully depreciated equipment--referred to by the author as "junk"--to keep the "Net Assets" denominator low. This discourages the acquisition of new, more efficient capital assets.
9. Performance Benchmarks: In the author's experience, facilities were not considered to be doing well unless their RONAE was over 80%. This high threshold sent a message to operating units that they should avoid new investments that would increase their asset base and lower their percentage.
10. Final Recommendation: The author concludes that there is no "one size fits all" solution and that managers must carefully evaluate both capitalization and expensing for heavy maintenance. The goal is to make "smart decisions" that reflect the actual financial reality and long-term needs of the facility.

Part 3: Essay Questions

Instructions: Use the concepts discussed in the source text to provide in-depth responses to the following prompts.

1. Comparative Analysis of Financial Impacts: Compare and contrast the immediate and long-term financial effects of expensing a $2 million repair versus capitalizing a $3 million asset, specifically focusing on the "cost per ton" metric.
2. The Conflict Between Metrics and Maintenance: Discuss how financial metrics like RONAE can create perverse incentives for plant managers, potentially leading to catastrophic equipment failure.
3. Operational Efficiency and Capital Investment: Beyond the balance sheet, explain the operational arguments for choosing capital replacement over maintenance, using the "tie-in time" and downtime examples from the text.
4. Strategic Asset Assignment: Explain the author's view on "smart uses of capital" and why he believes many organizations are currently failing to utilize the tax code to their advantage.
5. Risk Management in Heavy Industry: Evaluate the northwest US mill explosion as a case study in risk management. How might a different approach to asset assignment in 2024 have changed the outcome in 2026?

Part 4: Glossary of Key Terms

Term Definition

Asset Assignment The process of determining whether a business expenditure should be classified as a capital investment or an immediate expense.

Capitalize To record a cost or expense on the balance sheet for the purpose of delaying its full recognition; spreading the cost over the useful life of the asset.

Covenants Legally binding agreements or restrictions placed on a company by lenders, often regarding financial ratios.

De Minimis A term used to describe something that is too small or insignificant to merit concern; in this context, the $0.20 per ton cost of a capitalized asset.

Depreciation The reduction in the value of an asset over time, which is factored into financial metrics like RONAE.

Expense To record an expenditure as a cost against the current period's income, resulting in an immediate reduction in profit.

Net Assets Employed The total value of assets used to generate profit, typically calculated after accounting for depreciation.

RONAE Return on Net Assets Employed; a financial ratio used to measure the profitability of a company relative to its assets.

Tie-in Time The period during which a new piece of equipment is connected to the existing system, representing the minimal downtime required for new installations.

Tons per Year A measure of production capacity used to calculate the financial impact of costs on a per-unit basis.

________

Other interesting stories: